Mwepu Ilunga – Brazil vs Zaire – 1974

17 05 2010

Undoubtedly one of Ghostgoals favourite World Cup moments. Hilarity aside, it did cast a shadow over African football for many years, coming to represent their supposed naivety and lack of discipline.

Zaire were the first black African team to qualify for a World Cup, and 1974 was to prove their only apperance at the finals. The fateful Brazil game was preceeded by a 2-0 loss to Scotland and a 9-0 defeat to Yugoslavia. But for a case of mistaken identity Ilunga actually wouldn’t have been playing in the Brazil game at all. Against Yugoslavia, star striker Mulamba Ndaye was sent off for supposedly kicking the referee, the offence was, according to the Yugoslav coach, actually comitted by Ilunga.

Numerous explanations exist for Ilunga’s behaviour. The most amusing and surely completely untrue, being that it was a common misconception in Africa at the time that 3 seconds after the whistle was blown, free kicks became a ‘free ball’ and anything goes. Ilunga himself put his moment of madness down to the extreme pressure the team were under from their government back home.

“Before the Yugoslavia match, we learnt that we were not going to be paid, so initially we refused to play. After the match, President Mobutu sent his presidential guards to threaten us. They closed the hotel to all journalists and said that if we lost by more than three goals to Brazil, none of us would be able to return home.”

President Mobuto went on to claim that Ilunga’s actions had put back African football 20 years. Having been made promises of big bonuses and coaching roles, the players in actuality ended up with nothing. Final poignant words to Ilunga himself, “Look at me now, I’m living like a tramp. If I had my time again, I’d have worked harder at becoming a farmer”.

About these ads

Actions

Information

3 responses

18 05 2010
Tom Delane

Let’s not patronize them. They were naive. He was naive. Pressure doesn’t make people kick the ball away when the opposition gets a freekick. Unfamiliarity with the rules does. It’s the only explanation.

18 05 2010
theghostgoal

I’m not convinced Tom. To me it just looks like a moment of absolute blind panic. Anyway, I don’t think it is something that necessarily needs to be rationalised, just enjoyed.

23 05 2010
Kevin Coleman

Never heard nor saw of that before. Crazy.

Perhaps it wasn’t panic, nor naivity? Maybe he was just plain crazy….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s




Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 28 other followers