Stoke City: Evolution?

25 09 2011

by Adam Bate

It was no surprise to hear Jon Champion use the term “Neanderthal” to describe the Stoke experience on ESPN at the weekend. After all, when it comes to Stoke City, everyone seems to be pre-occupied with the notion of evolution.

This time last year, the man often seen as the personification of Stoke’s direct approach launched not a throw-in but a defence of his club’s style. Rory Delap said: “People go on about us being a long-ball team and relying on set-pieces. Well, we had to do a job to get in the league and stay in the league, but now we are looking to progress. But it won’t be an immediate change, it has to be slow.”

Speaking after Stoke’s stunning 5-0 FA Cup semi final triumph at Wembley in April, Tony Pulis was also keen to articulate the idea of an evolutionary side. Pulis said: “The team that won this semi-final is much different to the one which started out in the Premier League two and a half seasons ago in that we have become more expansive. It’s a case of evolution not revolution.”

Perhaps this is a good time to clarify this is no hatchet job on Stoke City’s style of play. The idea that there is a right way to play football is a risible concept. Beauty can be found in a tiki-taka passing move, a fast counter-attack or a long-ball through the middle. This piece merely seeks to answer the question – ‘Is Stoke’s style of play evolving?’

The first port of call should probably be to look at the Opta statistics for ‘short passing’. Although the quality of ‘style of play’ remains subjective, these stats are usually considered to be indicative of an aesthetically pleasing brand of football. Indeed, a feature of the better sides has been the number of short passes they have played per game.

For 2009-10 Arsenal topped the table for short passes ahead of Manchester United and Chelsea and this pattern was repeated again last season. This is in line with the widely held belief that Arsenal are a nice team to watch – better than their results would indicate. The start of this season has seen Manchester City climb to the top of the short passing table. This supports the idea of a team that is evolving and indulging in a more expansive game with better players.

Number of Short Passes per game: 2009-10, 2010-11, 2011-12 (part)

The evidence for the evolution of Stoke City’s style of play is somewhat more flimsy. Stoke City were at the bottom of the short passing table in 2009-10, 2010-11 and have already taken up their customary place after the early exchanges of the 2011-12 season. What’s more, there is a remarkable consistency. Stoke played an average of 215 short passes a game in 2009-10, then 220 a game last season and 221 a game this campaign. Well I guess they do say evolution is something that takes place over millions of years.

Another key performance indicator in terms of style is the ‘Goals from Open Play’ statistic. The common belief that Stoke rely on set-pieces should not preclude success from open play situations. And yet, while the top four of the ‘Goals from Open Play’ table for 2009-10 exactly mirrored (in order) the actual league table, Stoke languished down in 17th. Last season saw only a particularly turgid Birmingham side score fewer goals from open play. So far this season it is only the luckless Swansea that have failed to score as many as Stoke from open play.

But the key for Stoke fans must be that the team’s results are going in the right direction. Stoke have finished between 11th and 13th in their first three Premier League seasons and it would be no surprise if the team significantly improved on that showing this time around. And the key to that has to be the improvement in personnel:

While four of the starting eleven remain the same, the superiority of the current side is clear. This is further highlighted by the presence of high profile players such as Wilson Palacios and Matthew Upson on the bench.

So given the improvement in the quality of players, perhaps the real question ought to be: ‘Why is Stoke City’s style of play not evolving?’

It would seem the real evolution of the side has been in buying better players to play the same way rather than actually changing the style. Peter Crouch is the T-1000 model Terminator; an upgrade on Big Mama Sidibe. Elsewhere in the team, there is Jonathan Woodgate – regarded by some as the greatest defender England nearly had. He has impressed but, importantly, only within the framework of Stoke’s style – Woodgate completed just 14 passes against Manchester United.

One suspects Tony Pulis has realised this is the best way forward. He has experimented with introducing players such as Eidur Gudjohnsen and Tuncay to play between the lines and these players have been unable to be assimilated into the collective.

As a result, it would seem that Stoke’s real evolution may well be in purchasing superior players to fit into their already effective system. But don’t expect that to stop people inside and outside the club paying lip service to the God of style.

Advertisements

Actions

Information

8 responses

25 09 2011
Pete

I love watching Stoke come at the top teams. They really grew on me

26 09 2011
Gollo

Hang on – “assimilated into the collective” ??! I’m officially outing Ghostgoal as a closet Star Trek fan!!

26 09 2011
betweenthelinesfootball

I’ve been thinking the same thing myself this season. Watching them isn’t a constant bombardment from back to front, but it’s still a big part.

Comparing stats for the corresponding fixtures last season to those this season, there has been an improvement in pass completion of around 6% – as you point out though, possibly due to improvement in players rather than a change in style, as short passes per game only slightly up.

44% of their balls are played to the final third (the top clubs average around 35%).

Interesting also to note the last 3 league games, almost 20% of passes were played to Crouch!

26 09 2011
GhostGoal

Interesting. Yeah I saw someone mention that Crouch stat on Twitter – it’s a curious one.
One thing that’s a bit hard to measure is the impact of the Britannia. I didn’t mention it in the piece as the idea is a little hard to flesh out but it’s a narrow pitch and, as anyone who has ever been would testify, particularly windy.
Not sure whether that impacts ability to play a passing game also.

27 09 2011
betweenthelinesfootball

I think that could be a big factor – one of the commentators mentioned the pitch needing to be widened for the European games.

Have tried to quantify it, but the only thing the numbers show is Man Utd’s forwards had around 3% less of the ball at the Britannia compared to average, with the full backs having the extra. May also be due to the pitch not only being narrow, but quite short too (which also helps their front to back tactics)

28 09 2011
Squad sheets: Bolton Wanderers v Manchester United | Latest World Football News

[…] Make A Impressive Start To The Premier League Season“Chicharito” se vuelve a lesionarStoke City: Evolution? var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-11323369-7']); […]

28 09 2011
tagaunt

Really interesting analysis. That short passing stat is brilliant. I think Pulis has broken Football down into a simple formula, but that only works with the right players. No doubt if he later replaced Etherington with Bale and Crouch with Drogba they could play the same way and be even more effective.

*I obviously do not think these 2 additions are in any way plausible….

30 09 2011
Liverpool FC: Stoke City Scouting Report and How the Reds Can Win | Latest World Football News

[…] Stoke City liverpool macı, beşiktaş Stoke City macıSunderland 4-0 Stoke City: Goal-crazy CatsStoke City: Evolution? var _gaq = _gaq || []; _gaq.push(['_setAccount', 'UA-11323369-7']); […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s